Thomas (boggyb) wrote,

  • Mood:
  • Music:

Listserver shenigans

So there's an interesting little debate going on on a certain forum I frequent.

The gist of it is that member A was banned from the community-run listservers (the official ones having gone 404 a long time ago) for crashing servers. He was originally banned for one month, but that got extended for various reasons to 2 months. The ban officially expired on 30th November last year (2005).

Members B and C run a listserver each. Member C unbanned member A a while back, as per the original agreement. Member B has not, and has expressed no desire to ever do so. There is possible circumstancial evidence of member A continuing to crash servers, however nothing is currently known for certain (and there is also less circumstancial evidence of it being another member).

Given that, who out of members B and C is taking the correct action?
Tags: internets, question, rant

  • NaBloPoMo!

    It's November, which means it's time for anther month of semi-coherent ramblings! Ironically, despite the current Covid insanity today was much like…

  • NaBloPoMo!

    Yes, it's that time of year where I try to create an entire month's worth of random ramblings! Today ended with a surprise games evening, courtesy…

  • NaBloPoMo result

    Well, another year, another November of trying to think of some random insanity to post every day. This year was less successful that past ones, in…

  • Post a new comment


    default userpic
    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.