Thomas (boggyb) wrote,
Thomas
boggyb
  • Mood: annoyed
So, the European Court of Human Rights tells the UK government to give prisoners the vote. The Commons holds a debate on the issue, listens to speeches both for and against, and then votes overwhelmingly (234 to 22) for not giving the prisoners the vote. Technically this is non-binding, but it'd look rather silly for the government to ignore it.

The Council of Europe then tells the UK government to, basically, ignore what the Commons have decided and give prisoners the vote anyway.

Riiiiight. So apparently the fact that our democratically elected ministers have made a decision (properly debated and all) means absolutely nothing unless it's the decision that the EU wants.

For the record, if anything I'm slightly in favour of prisoners nearing the end of their sentence getting the vote. However, I don't think that should happen because the EU has browbeaten us into doing so.
Tags: politics
Subscribe

  • (no subject)

    Interesting tidbit of news: about a third of Felixstowe Port's capacity is currently taken up with a stockpile of 11 thousand shipping containers…

  • Dominic Cummings has left the building

    Today's surprise news is Dominic Cummings has left Number 10. And by "left", it appears the correct term is "booted out". The news this morning was…

  • Brexit means arrows?

    So I was watching the F1 on TV just now, and what should appear but an advert by the government attempting to explain why they think Brexit is a Good…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    switch
    default userpic
    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
    Help
  • 1 comment