Thomas (boggyb) wrote,
Thomas
boggyb

Proof that not all "CPU Idle" utilities are snake oil

A while back, I set up a spare computer here as a server. Unfortuantly, computers require electricity, and this resulted in a bit of a surprise when my electricity bill came through. But I looked at it, and it all added up and wasn't that much bigger, and so thought nothing more of it.

Today my next electricity bill came through, with a substantial underestimate on my actual power usage, and so I decided to do the maths. Turns out that Metis (the spare computer) sucks about 120W, and is responsible for over a third of my power usage. Ouch.

So I did some digging, and it turns out that sometimes Windows doesn't properly idle the processor for various reasons. Instead of executing a special "go to sleep until something happens" command, it just sits there doing the computer equivalent of jogging on the spot. There's many CPU Idle programs that purport to actually reduce your CPU temperature, but I've always been a bit sceptical of them.

Well, I downloaded a shareware one to see if it actually did anything, and just starting up the program was enough to drop the power consumption down to 70W. This is without even running the utilities "idle loop" - some hardware poking it does at startup is enough to make Windows start idling the system properly. That'll make my next bill nicer.
Subscribe

  • Computer specs

    The first part of the long-overdue computer rebuild posts! Back in May, I finally brought my desktop kicking and screaming into the current…

  • Skyward Sword HD: for SCIENCE!

    One thing I've noticed from playing through Skyward Sword HD is how... underwhelming the skyward strike appears, at least to begin with. It takes a…

  • Random quote

    pleaseremove, setting a work quiz: "No, I'm going to get my wrong answers right"

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic
    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 1 comment