Log in

No account? Create an account
'Twas brillig, and the slithy toves did gyre and gimble in the wabe [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]

[ website | Beware the Jabberwock... ]
[ deviantArt | the-boggyb ]
[ FanFiction | Torkell ]
[ Tumblr | torkellr ]

[Random links| BBC news | Vulture Central | Slashdot | Dangerous Prototypes | LWN | Raspberry Pi]
[Fellow blogs| a Half Empty Glass | the Broken Cube | The Music Jungle | Please remove your feet | A letter from home]
[Other haunts| Un4seen Developments | Jazz 2 Online | EmuTalk.net | Feng's shui]

Proof that not all "CPU Idle" utilities are snake oil [Saturday 20th June 2009 at 3:37 pm]

A while back, I set up a spare computer here as a server. Unfortuantly, computers require electricity, and this resulted in a bit of a surprise when my electricity bill came through. But I looked at it, and it all added up and wasn't that much bigger, and so thought nothing more of it.

Today my next electricity bill came through, with a substantial underestimate on my actual power usage, and so I decided to do the maths. Turns out that Metis (the spare computer) sucks about 120W, and is responsible for over a third of my power usage. Ouch.

So I did some digging, and it turns out that sometimes Windows doesn't properly idle the processor for various reasons. Instead of executing a special "go to sleep until something happens" command, it just sits there doing the computer equivalent of jogging on the spot. There's many CPU Idle programs that purport to actually reduce your CPU temperature, but I've always been a bit sceptical of them.

Well, I downloaded a shareware one to see if it actually did anything, and just starting up the program was enough to drop the power consumption down to 70W. This is without even running the utilities "idle loop" - some hardware poking it does at startup is enough to make Windows start idling the system properly. That'll make my next bill nicer.
Link | Previous Entry | Share | Flag | Next Entry[ One penny | Penny for your thoughts? ]

[User Picture]From: pleaseremove
Sunday 21st June 2009 at 8:38 am (UTC)
That is why my plans have grown to include this beast:


Far from cheap and in terms of electricity it will take some time to be worth it, but it fulfils all my needs while only using 30W on stand-by.
(Reply) (Thread)